时间：2005年12月7日下午­

地点：英国议会下院­

时段：Prime Minister’s Questions­

事件：戴维·卡梅伦当选保守党领袖后第一次在下院Prime Minister’s Questions­中遭遇首相托尼·布莱尔

Jeff Ennis (Barnsley, East and Mexborough) (Lab): Can my right hon. Friend tell me how he will deal with a young, handsome, intelligent, charismatic politician, such as myself—[Laughter.]—and how Parliament can better engage ordinary people in the political process?

时间：2004年10月13日下午

地点：英国议会下院

时段：Prime Minister’s Questions

事件：托尼·布莱尔VS迈克尔·霍华德，布莱尔再度因伊战问题遭遇诚信危机

Sir Teddy Taylor: As we have not heard a great deal recently about policy on the single currency, will the Prime Minister say whether it is still the policy of Her Majesty’s Government to seek entry, subject to tests? If so, in the event of his being re-elected, when would the referendum be held? If there were a clear no vote, would he accept that absolutely as a decision for the foreseeable future?

时间：2005年3月9日下午

地点：英国议会下院

时段：Prime Minister’s Questions

事件：托尼·布莱尔VS迈克尔·霍华德

Mr. Kevin McNamara (Hull, North) (Lab): At the weekend, my right hon. Friend welcomed statements by the leaders of Sinn Fein that they would help to bring Mr. McCartney’s murderers to justice. Does he share the horror and contempt that the rest of the community in these islands feel at statements by the IRA yesterday that it was prepared to assassinate the murderers of Mr. McCartney but not prepared to bring them to justice? When my right hon. Friend next meets the leaders of Provisional Sinn Fein or has any contact with them through No. 10, will he clearly bring it to their attention that there is nowhere in these islands where we can have parallel police forces, kangaroo courts or assassinations of people whom we do not particularly like?

时间：2005年1月19日下午

地点：英国议会下院

时段：Prime Minister’s Questions

事件：托尼·布莱尔PK迈克尔·霍华德，大选临近，火药味弥漫

Mr. Michael Howard (Folkestone and Hythe) (Con): Before the last election, the Prime Minister promised not to increase the basic or top rate of income tax. Will he give the same pledge today?

时间：2004年1月28日下午

地点：英国议会下院

时段：Prime Minister’s Questions

事件：托尼·布莱尔PK迈克尔·霍华德，辩论白热化

David Burnside: I join the Prime Minister in expressing condolences to the family and friends of that serving member of our armed forces. ­

The Prime Minister was probably not aware as we were preparing for the great education debate yesterday that, the day before, the Minister with responsibility for education in the Northern Ireland Office announced that academic selection between the primary and secondary sectors in Northern Ireland should end. The Prime Minister should be aware that Northern Ireland has in its secondary sector and grammar schools, such as Antrim grammar school and Ballyclare high school, the highest academic standards—better than all the rest of the United Kingdom. That is a great selling point for Northern Ireland. Will the Prime Minister personally intervene to defend our grammar schools, as something good and positive in Northern Ireland?

时间：2003年4月30日下午

地点：英国议会下院

时段：Prime Minister’s Questions

事件：托尼·布莱尔PK邓肯·史密斯

Mr. Iain Duncan Smith (Chingford and Woodford Green): On the issue of European defence, the Prime Minister said to the House that

       " it would be a tragic mistake . . . if Britain opted out of the debate on European defence and left the field to others."—[Official Report, 13 December 1999; Vol. 341, c. 22.]

Yesterday, France, Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg met to discuss European defence. Why was not Britain involved?

时间：2006年5月3日下午

地点：英国议会下院

时段：Prime Minister’s Questions

事件：托尼·布莱尔辩论戴维·卡梅伦监狱问题

Mr. David Cameron (Witney) (Con): The Home Secretary was told last July about the scandal of dangerous prisoners released on to our streets instead of being considered for deportation. The Prime Minister has now had a week to find out what is actually going on in the Home Office. Can he explain why the rate at which prisoners were released and not deported actually accelerated after the Home Secretary found out about it?

时间：2006年2月8日下午

地点：英国议会下院

时段：Prime Minister’s Questions

事件：托尼·布莱尔辩论戴维·卡梅伦教育改革

Mr. Cameron: The Prime Minister has said that every time he introduced a reform, he wished he had gone further. Why is it that on the biggest reform of this Parliament—education—he is going backwards?